<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playing Against Type</title>
	<atom:link href="http://betterangels.wordpress.com/2004/12/17/playing-against-type/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betterangels.wordpress.com/2004/12/17/playing-against-type/</link>
	<description>ad astra, per aspera</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:29:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Moral Tension</title>
		<link>http://betterangels.wordpress.com/2004/12/17/playing-against-type/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Moral Tension</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterangels.wordpress.com/2004/12/17/playing-against-type/#comment-397</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d really like to know what April and others think of this paper on&lt;a href=&quot;http://academic.evergreen.edu/Curricular/iescriticalthinking/downloads/lahti-weinsteinEHB.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the evolution of morality&lt;/a&gt;. The connection to Better Angles will be obvious. I think it &quot;predicts&quot; many of the most amazing features of the current administration.

And while we are at it, let me say that the recent electoral debacle suggests that we should talk about politics more rather than less.

Bret
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d really like to know what April and others think of this paper on<a href="http://academic.evergreen.edu/Curricular/iescriticalthinking/downloads/lahti-weinsteinEHB.pdf" rel="nofollow">the evolution of morality</a>. The connection to Better Angles will be obvious. I think it &#8220;predicts&#8221; many of the most amazing features of the current administration.</p>
<p>And while we are at it, let me say that the recent electoral debacle suggests that we should talk about politics more rather than less.</p>
<p>Bret</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mouse that Roared</title>
		<link>http://betterangels.wordpress.com/2004/12/17/playing-against-type/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mouse that Roared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2005 20:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterangels.wordpress.com/2004/12/17/playing-against-type/#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Champions AGAINST big government?  LOL.  They&#039;ve got a big government right now.  Fiscal responsibility?  Hah!  An out-of-control deficit does not constitute fiscal responsibility.  Saddling future generations with debt (as the borrow-and-spend GOP does) is not fiscal responsibility.

There are so many ways that the  GOP betrays its own principles that we&#039;d be stupid not to call them on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Champions AGAINST big government?  LOL.  They&#8217;ve got a big government right now.  Fiscal responsibility?  Hah!  An out-of-control deficit does not constitute fiscal responsibility.  Saddling future generations with debt (as the borrow-and-spend GOP does) is not fiscal responsibility.</p>
<p>There are so many ways that the  GOP betrays its own principles that we&#8217;d be stupid not to call them on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kief</title>
		<link>http://betterangels.wordpress.com/2004/12/17/playing-against-type/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>kief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterangels.wordpress.com/2004/12/17/playing-against-type/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>The problem I have with this idea is that it predates Nixon. This is the strategy that resulted in Democratic administrations taking us into Vietnam and then escalating the conflict there. During the Cold War, Democrats fearful of the label &quot;soft on Communism&quot; tried to out-hawk the Republicans to compensate. 

I&#039;m sure Republicans would love it if Democrats allow them to drive Democratic strategy by accusing them of being &quot;Soft on Terrorism&quot;. 

Personally, I would prefer to see the Democrats (or anybody credible) go after the Republicans on real American, democratic values. To me, their vulnerability is their waving of the flag of democracty while making civil rights a dirty word. Here again they&#039;ve been driving the agenda by making &quot;card carrying member of the ACLU&quot; a perjurative, while somehow positioning themselves as champions against &quot;big government&quot;. There are lots of hypocracies here to exploit against the Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem I have with this idea is that it predates Nixon. This is the strategy that resulted in Democratic administrations taking us into Vietnam and then escalating the conflict there. During the Cold War, Democrats fearful of the label &#8220;soft on Communism&#8221; tried to out-hawk the Republicans to compensate. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure Republicans would love it if Democrats allow them to drive Democratic strategy by accusing them of being &#8220;Soft on Terrorism&#8221;. </p>
<p>Personally, I would prefer to see the Democrats (or anybody credible) go after the Republicans on real American, democratic values. To me, their vulnerability is their waving of the flag of democracty while making civil rights a dirty word. Here again they&#8217;ve been driving the agenda by making &#8220;card carrying member of the ACLU&#8221; a perjurative, while somehow positioning themselves as champions against &#8220;big government&#8221;. There are lots of hypocracies here to exploit against the Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
